Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (3861)	12/28/1999 12:31:00 PM
From: Sailfish	Read Replies (2) of 4504

Hi Bruce... I'd have to think that the principals who antied up the $27.5 million financing were given some kind of solid assurances that the relocation of the town of TG was a fait accompli... I couldn't see any reasonable individual putting up that kind of money based only on known results from TG-3 plus unknowns from the other anomalies on the properties as well as being overshadowed by the relocation question... Once the company makes an announcement that an agreement has been arrived at, then the stock will go ballistic... This is a $20 stock easily... Question...As VMS deposits are prone to occur in clusters, IYO would there be a probability that we could expect similar situations to occur with regard to Oxide Caps on each or any VMS deposit..?? Another Oxide Cap with a high grade Au/Ag content would be nice ;-) Regards....Ray

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next