SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : ADVR - Bulls no Bears
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kingfisher who wrote (361)4/22/1997 1:15:00 AM
From: s martin   of 913
 
"Is it not self evident that the ADVR management carries a far greater risk than any shareholder if they are not successful in getting Reticulose approved?"

NO it is not self evident that the "management is at far greater risk than the shareholder" What kind of hogwash is that? The "managment", has already made a fortune by awarding themselves millions of shares of stock at bargain basement prices and cashing in on timed new releases, which were partially fabrications. The ahsreholders who bought the stock last year are risked and lost. Dr. Hirshman at risK ? You read his contract? You better do some reading Joe. Hirshman has an extremely generous contract and millions of shares of stock. He has a and will profit handsomely if "r" never sees the light of day.

<<<<"Regardless of where the price of the stock will go, the important thing is that the dispensing of Reticulose is approved by the FDA">>>

The FDA has never approved the dispensing of Reticulose. Where did you come up with that?

Mike Kugler, any minute now you will be branded with a new name, Shawn Murphy, SMartin, Doug, Joe Blow or Popeye the Sailor Man. This interesting thread thrives on obfusication and name calling. Factual information or negative opinions are not allowed, they interfere with the hype of this "sterling" company and it's 60 year old unproven drug. The FDA has not approved the "drug" because there is no scientific proof that it works, just a claim that it won't harm you. The same can be said for water.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News