s.,
Your quote:
<<<<"Regardless of where the price of the stock will go, the important thing is that the dispensing of Reticulose is approved by the FDA">>>
I think what the quotee is saying is that the important thing is that the FDA 'should' consider approval of the drug, not that it already has approved it. I can see where you might have thought that was the intent of that quote. But I truly believe it was not so. Of course, whether the FDA considers approvals is interwoven with ADVR's applications and verifiable backup data to the application.
Also, let's, please, not get into the Shawn Murphy stuff...please. If your intent here is to stir trouble, please take it elsewhere. I have made my peace with you and am not interesting in sparring online with you here. Let's just stick to the facts, and correctly quoting here. You've already misquoted me once here, claiming I had said I lived near ADVR, and we both know that was a total misquote. However I am more than willing to offer a peaceful hand so that we can keep this thread free from the taint of past arguments.
If you have some fruitful factual information that is either positive _or_ negative, you should feel free to post it without the threat of attack, and I would welcome you to do just that.
Statements like your previous post::
<<The FDA has not approved the "drug" because there is no scientific proof that it works, just a claim that it won't harm you.>>>
...should be backed up by factual data and scientific refutations to the already published data ADVR and Dr. Hirschman's in vitro and in vivo studies. Making a statement like that has no more weight than anything ADVR says without backing supportable data.
Thanks |
