SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Grinders and Gripers Coffee Shop

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Savant who wrote (3909)12/30/1999 7:57:00 AM
From: Apex  Read Replies (1) of 4201
 
...all aboard, and BTW way how much did that implant cost you?

=======================
Airport X-Ray Device Spurs Concerns 

By Deepti Hajela
Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, Dec. 29, 1999; 9:51 p.m. EST

NEW YORK –– An X-ray scanner that can see through clothing is setting
off alarms for those who say using the machine on air travelers constitutes
an invasion of privacy.

The U.S. Customs Service has been using the BodySearch device at John
F. Kennedy International Airport and five other major airports around the
country to search for contraband for most of this year. Plans are to have it
installed at all of the country's major airports by June of next year.

The machine uses low doses of X-rays to scan a traveler, displaying an
image of the person's body on a screen. It looks like an outline filled in
with white chalk, but doesn't show physical details like a photograph
would.

The display does show anything that is being carried either in a person's
clothing or on the body, such as weapons or packages of illegal drugs.

Customs Commissioner Raymond Kelley said Wednesday that anyone
who is subjected to a search at an airport where the device is in place
would have an option of undergoing a physical pat-down instead of being
scanned by the machine.

"People object to being physically touched," he said. "In response to that
we brought in the scanners."

Customs is facing numerous lawsuits from people alleging they were
singled out for body searches because of their race or sex. The allegations
first were reported by The Associated Press last year.

But some say the X-rays are more invasive than a pat-down, since the
scan shows the outline of a traveler's naked body.

In testimony to an international conference on aviation safety, Gregory T.
Nojeim, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the
scanner can show private parts with clarity and that portions of the display
could be enlarged by the viewer.

"If there is ever a place where a person has a reasonable expectation of
privacy, it is under their clothing," he said in his testimony.

But Robert Peters, vice president of American Science and Engineering of
Billerica, Mass., which makes the machines, said concerns about the
images were exaggerated, noting that the display doesn't show specifics
such as scars, birthmarks, or even muscle definition.

"It's not like you're getting a photograph of a naked person," he said.

© Copyright 1999 The Associated Press
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext