Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Senior who wrote (9463)	12/31/1999 8:50:00 AM
From: Madharry	Read Replies (1) of 78576

The question is what price a monopoly. which Qualcom pretty much is and INT is not. Qualcomm has always seemed too expensive for me. I own VARL as my way to participate in the wireless revolution. See the VARL thread if you are interested in learning more about this company. VARL has earnings and has around 75% of the market it participates in. Is the PE ratio high? Yes. But the company looks like it has years of earnings growth ahead of it and our tax structure heaps great rewards on those who can select long term growth stocks(see WEB) That is the difference between INT and Qualcomm. The cut off for comparing investments is not one year but rather 20-30.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next