Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (57674)	12/31/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: SargeK	Read Replies (1) of 95453

Slider and his Usual and Expected Threats A couple of days ago, it was litigation: messages.yahoo.com Today: He thinks I am in violation of SEC rules/regs with this statement: "That sounds like an SEC violation of preferential release of a material event/item/news. - which obviously "new orders" would be." Fact of the matter is FGH/IR specifically qualified that remark by stating orders to which he was referring were available to the public in already published trade journals (which I had just explained to him, I did not subscribe to). To state the phones are ringing and inquiries are at high levels, I hardly think would warrant SEC attention. (Incidentally, these remarks were also made to others who had contacted the IR.) The remainder of the remarks were posted on YAHOO by another FGH long (regular poster with credibility) who had also talked to FGH/IR. I merely consolidated the remarks in the referenced post. FGH/IR is a highly competent professional who is comfortable with truth. I do not think he will take your threats any more seriously than I do. Have a good day little cretin. SargeK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next