SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.640-0.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bux who wrote (3138)1/2/2000 12:45:00 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
Bux:

Remember when we were having the debate on the bandwidth issue in Qualcomm's patents.

There was a court case, Wang v. Aol

The court narrowly interpretted the claims to the technology at the time the invention was made.

Therefore, IMO, Qualcomms older patents may implicitly be bandwidth limited (i.e. pertain only to IS-95 applications)

In addition, another point, there had to be a modification to the system in order to get higher bandwidth. If so, the system would have to be changed and those patents which covered the older system would not apply to high bandwidth applications.

dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext