SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (29690)1/2/2000 12:58:00 AM
From: ToySoldier  Read Replies (1) of 42771
 
Well, considering that XML and SQL both end in the letter "L", I would have to say that they are quite similar in nature. They are both a form of "Language" designed to convey a structured message from a source to a destination. The main difference is that the destination of SQL is a database and the for XML it is almost anything (a database, a directory, a web browser, an application, etc.).

In its purist definition I would agree that SQL and XML are not access protocols (they are languages), but they could easily be considered and used as one depending on how it was implemented.

And I will go one step further in saying that not only is SQL not the best way to store data or information, it cant at all. It can carry data in the form of an SQL response, but not store it. Thats the job of the database.

XLM on the otherhand could store data but I would only consider that to be an XLM structured data form. XLM itself is more the language, template, schema, etc. Correct me on this statement if I am out - you know better than I on the XML topic.

Toy
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext