Microvision (MVIS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microvision (MVIS)

MVIS 0.854

+0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: vpelt who wrote (3968)	1/2/2000 9:09:00 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) of 7721

Dear Vpelt and Obewon: I agree with Obewons comments in general which is why I have merely been slowly acquiring rather than rush pell mell into this stock. However, what has not been clear in my mind from the beginning is this: Do we or do we not have clear patented rights to the VRD technology? I was well aware of QCOM when it was $20 a share but failed to take the oportunity as there was court case going on with ERICY over the technology. I honestly thought ERICY would win and without that patented technolgy QCOM was worthless IMHO as they were not profitable in their basic manufacturing that Obewon talks of. I was wrong on that account, dont think my Ego would allow my to survive being wrong AGAIN!! IF, we have clear ownership of the technology then I think its only a matter of time until this stock has the capability of becoming another qcom type stock. IF NOT, that is an entirely different story. May still yield nice profits but not OBSCENE ones. I always like the Obscene. haha. JDN

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next