DISCUSSION OF DOCTRINE of CHRISTIAN CHURCHES Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : DISCUSSION OF DOCTRINE of CHRISTIAN CHURCHES

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (40)	1/5/2000 2:40:00 AM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (1) of 454

RE>>Also, you still didn't answer my question as to what the faithful did before the bible was put together in year 325.<< I thought I told you I did not bother to answer you because you have not study the History of the Bible much at all or you would not say the things you say.. You thought the KJV was the first English Bible. How much could you have possibly studied? Also .. why would I address a false Roman assertion like this... "The bible was put together in the year 325" The Bible had been translated into 7 different languages by the year 200 AD. The Roman Government was still killing Christians under Septimius Severus while the Church ( Not Rome ) had recognized 23 books of the New Testament as being Canonical. In the year 180 AD Irenaeus of Lyons , a student of Polycarp wrote a book called " Against Heresies" and listed 20 books of the New Testament as being Canonical. Remember that many date the book of Revelations as being granted to Paul at 96 AD. Before that in 144 AD there is historical record of a man named "Marcion" who was excommunicated as an Heretic for teaching that there was no connection between the OLD TESTAMENT and the "NEW TESTAMENT" ( compilation of books just as the old ) and in fact taught that the "God of the Jews" was a different God that the "God of the Gentiles" and that false teaching did not die for 100's of years. The way some people talk about the Old Testament and God changing is not that much different when you think about it. RE>>, "Take this and eat it, this is my body."?<< I have dealt with people who are caught in the cult of Rome before... What it boils down to is this.. They teach what the Church teaches but never check anywhere outside of to see if it is true. They will use maybe 10% scripture and 90% anything else to prove themselves When cornered they change the subject or will say " I do not know but I am SURE MY PRIEST can answer that. Rome violate so many scriptures why would you believe her testimony about history? The Church of Rome is a Lair and Her Father is the Devil. Their is only enough of the truth to make her "look" like light: 2 Cor 11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. The Church of Rome is "Another Gospel" Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. You need to repent of defending the heresies of Rome lest you receive the curse of Paul.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next