SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GlobalMarine who wrote (85066)1/5/2000 8:12:00 AM
From: niceguy767  Read Replies (1) of 1584046
 
Hi Rand:

Nothing expands market share faster than word of mouth of the satisfied customer!

This growing base of customer satisfaction has been reinforced by awards such as the 1999 technical excellence award from PC magazine and is,in marketing terms, only in its trendsetting stage, on the bell curve . Meanwhile production has evolved from 500 to 750 Mhz almost seamlessly, no mean feat for a new architecture, particularly when compared with production problems experienced during the evolution of INTC's existing architecture, which might indicate, in market terms, that PWeeIII's are in their declining stages of development!

Although too early to assess with unerring accuracy, it appears that an increment of 1 million Athlons results in close to $1.00 per AMD share. That is to say that if AMD were to ship 1.5 million Athlons in 1999, an additional $1.50 could be added to share value, all other things equal, from negative $1.10 in Q2 to positive $0.40 in Q4...

Should this relationship between incremental Athlons and eps hold true through Y2000 (I stress, it's an exceedingly premature assumption at this time) and should Salomon Smith Barney be accurate in their production number of 12.5 million Athlons in Y2000, obviously AMD eps skyrockets and share price stands to be enhanced by no small amount, assuming most of the 12.5 Athlons are shipped...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext