SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : DOW 36000 - Glassman and Hassett

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: noiserider who wrote (27)1/5/2000 5:08:00 PM
From: Sid Turtlman  Read Replies (1) of 42
 
Noiserider: Did you write G&H and, if so, did they respond? My guess is that if they did, their response would be to reject any question that wasn't framed well within the context of academic finance theory.

Forced to use that language, and therefore to focus on the justification why a given risk premium for stocks seems like the correct one, their assumptions and logic don't seem unreasonable. It is only by seeing the contradictions between that whole way of looking at things and the reality of how the stock market interacts with the real world of capital raising and spending companies, that it becomes clear how ludicrous their work is.

G&H are just taking modern portfolio theory and using it to produce some extreme conclusions. The flaw isn't with what they are doing as much as with that whole system of thought, which doesn't take into account how stock prices influence the real economy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext