SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ICO (Inacom) LeadingTech Mgmt Services Co
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KLP who wrote (247)1/6/2000 6:57:00 AM
From: Scott A. Trapp  Read Replies (1) of 274
 
I completely agree with your points but as a shareholder I am looking at the company as a whole and see it as having a large problem with debt. Therefore I feel they should be focused on debt reduction for a couple of years then make the move if it is necessary. I have seen other boards talking that this may be a move to set up the rest of the company to be sold off. As I am located in Omaha yes I have some interest in the company but I really doubt that by moving the HQ to the east coast will make the company flourish. This argument could be made the same way for a company like Union Pacific. They were once located out east but moved back to Omaha and I don't believe it has make a difference in their customer base. I feel this is a lame excuse made by the CEO to move our company closer to his home. Maybe this will pay off with some of his connections I don't know.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News