Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.94

-5.1%

Nov 13 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (95217)	1/6/2000 5:43:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) of 186894

John, >>>but wern't there some statements from Intel during the quarter that they could/would meet their CURRENT comittments, but that they wouldn't be able to meet ADDITIONAL orders.<<< Yeah, I think I remember that. Didn't they send Stuart, the redheaded kid with the sgraggily beard from the mail room, to New York to meet some Wall Street guys at some fish and chip place. I think he said something about not only meeting current committments but to %$#%^^$$### it. Of course I'm only joking, but don't you think that Intel obviously knew the situation and didn't make the proper disclosures. I mean in a way that was clear and could be clearly understood by people like you, me , Osha, Kumar, and others? I am also positive that you will never convict Intel of inproper disclosures as I am sure they will drag out some quote that some executive made that now in hindsight can be clearly interpreted. But why go thru this nonsense? Mary

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next