SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.94-5.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (95270)1/7/2000 1:09:00 AM
From: Diamond Jim  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Paul, you are hired to do Intel PR. Wouldn't it be wonderful if Intel came out and said exactly that when Mr Todd was pointing the finger at Intel?

What you said below is just perfect.
---------
Why does everyone assume that Intel "fouled up" with Gateway?

If Gateway, for example, forecasted for, say, 75,000 450 MHz Pentium IIs/week in August, and Intel scheduled their factories for that number (remember, Intel's process time is about 9 to 11 weeks), and in early November Gateway UPS THEIR request to 125,000 450 MHz Pentium IIs/week , what can Intel do? Especially, when Dell, Compaq, HP, Sony, etc were most likely ALSO asking for increased delivery allotments ?

So, is Intel to blame in this case ?

Absolutely not.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext