All I have done is post the results, for me, of following the advice of these guys. You don't like it and are turning that into something else.
I have no problem in your tracking the performance of mine or anybody else's picks. I have a problem with your innuendos at maliase.
I think the response you gave, the way you twisted the reality, is an indication of your having a problem.......
Excuse me? That response is typical of a person who doesn't know what he/she is doing.
Are you afraid you'll be sued?
Not a bit.
You may have cost people a lot of money and you don't know it because they're ashamed to admit they took your advice.
I really don't know if any one lost a lot of money based on my advice. Yes, they should be ashamed if they lose only by partially following the advice. In one of the earliest notes on my thread I gave two cardinal rules of investing - sell stops and protecting capital. These rules apply to any stock.
You are banking on people like me keeping quiet, and maybe that is how subjects like yours continue.
I am not banking on you or anyone keeping quiet. Nor am I afraid the you will sue me. This is one of the reasons why I always posted my interest in the stocks I recommended.
You admit you yourself have recommended stocks that tanked.
It is obvious to me that you never looked at my picks in perspective. Don't misjudge a little modesty to be incompetence. I know several people who were able to make money both ways on MEMC purely based on my advice. I cautioned everyone about a possible disaster with Citrix. These things happened at least a few weeks before the stocks really tanked. On the contrary, the so called semi-expert at JP Morgan issued a hold on MEMC AFTER it tanked. Several sell-side analysts lowered ratings on Citrix AFTER it tanked.
It seems to me that if someone is self-assured enough to place himself as such an expert that he starts his own "stock picks" public subject on a telecom service, promoting himself as an expert by that alone, he should be willing to accept the results of his picks and allow them to be public, too.
May be you are better off with a wall street analysts like Tom Kurlak who would give you perfect reccos all the time. FYI, You could have bought Micron at 85 based on Rick Whittington's sage advice and 18 months later still be underwater. He is a professional, you know. Is he Semiconductor "expert?" That's what they say. Does he know jack sh*t about DRAM business? I doubt if he does.
People don't like to look like jerks, so they keep quiet. You are
banking on people like me keeping quiet, and maybe that is how subjects like yours continue.
On the contrary, it is better for people to speak out about their losses. That way it will put things in perspective for me. To me those who are really speaking out with emotional venegence and ignoring hard facts look like jerks.
Looks like you don't even read the current notes fully before writing an emotionally charged attack note. It is folly of me to expect you to go back and read old notes to put things in perspective, much less do due dilligence on the stocks you buy. One a final note, before you prepare your next attack reply, I suggest you go back and dig some of my old notes on Prodigy to verify facts.
My bottom line for you is this: if you or anybody want a sure thing, buy money market funds. If you want to be in stocks, buy a mutual fund or hire a full service broker. You don't have to listen to Mark Moran, or Mike Burke or Mohan Venigalla.
Good luck!
-Mohan |
