Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Petz who wrote (85830)	1/7/2000 4:04:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) of 1572642

Re: "Intel could not deliver that many low end PIII parts." Yes Petz, we all know that. Nobody's disputing that. The point is that Intel didn't commit to shipping as many as GTW wanted. Intel is sold out. There aint no more. Done, gone, empty, kaput, the complete absence there of. You guys are so quick to say Intel punishes companies that stray from the fold and it's killing you that this blows your whole argument. Compaq isn't whining. Why didn't Intel with hold product from them and give it to Gateway to reward them for dumping AMD? That would fit perfectly your conspiracy theory. Why didn't Intel screw HP or IBM to divert product to their loyal chump Gateway? That's what the AMD conspiracy theory predicts and it didn't happen!!! In your wild hysteria you do the only thing you know how to do and that's blame Intel for NOT doing EXACTLY what you were dying to condemn them for. There never was a conspiracy and there never was a yield crash and it's just killing you guys that Intel was fair all the way around. EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next