<<Sheesh ! You talk like my grandfather Victor. Old isn't necessarily better ? In companies, it almost never is...!>>
Try this, young happy girl-
The EPS rating from William O'Neill's institutional advisory database for WMT is 91. In other words, WMT's earnings-per-share growth for the last five years outperformed that of 91% of the 12,000 publicly-traded companies in O'Neill's institutional advisory database. AMZN has a 3 EPS rating, meaning 97% of publicly-traded companies have better earnings-per-share growth over the last five years.
In terms of relative stock performance, WMT sports a RS of 75, meaning WMT's stock price performance for the last 12 months outperformed that of 75% of the 12,000 publicly-traded companies in O'Neill's institutional advisory database. AMZN? Well ?.. uh?.. AMZN's RS is um, 30, meaning that for the last 12 months, 70% of 12,000 publicly-traded companies had better stock price performance than AMZN did.
For the last 12 mos, WMT is up 75%; AMNZ's stock is flat for the last 12 months. I'll take your grandfathers' stock any day.
Victor |
