Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kash johal who wrote (86019)	1/8/2000 2:57:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) of 1573028

<It seems to me that there are several risks with Willamette:> Here are couple of other risks: - Wilamette may need to be in 0.13 to scale well (mostly a power, yield issues) [By the way I got my first negative report on 0.13 recently - one of my sources is telling me a slip to Q4 is possible. If that happens AMD has much better chance of MHz parity or leadership going into Christmas] - Wilamette has a lot of interesting circuits that are going to require DV that may put some interesting blocks along the way - And finally, Wilamette definitely needs 0.13 to attain volumes. So, eve if everything goes absolutely perfectly, real volumes (tens of Mu) may not occur until 2001.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next