SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Murder Mystery: Who Killed Yale Student Suzanne Jovin?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James R. Barrett who wrote (167)1/9/2000 5:13:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 1397
 
Jim is driving around looking for Suzanne. He has decided he must convince her to not report him to the dean on Monday.

For this scenario to be plausible, we'd have to assume a) there was evidence Suzanne was going to report Jim, b) Jim had knowledge of this evidence, c) Jim thought that despite a "clean" record over many years at Yale and despite stellar student evaluations, one student saying they didn't approve of him might cost him a job (note: the New Haven police, parents, students, etc. rule out a sexual relationship), and d) the risk of being caught killing someone was worth it to save his job.

In response:

a) No one, not even Suzanne's parents, have said Suzanne was planning to report him. Therefore, to make this part "work" we would have to assume only Suzanne knew she planned to do this, and didn't even write about this in her diary.

b) If Suzanne didn't tell anyone, why tell Jim? I'd think he'd be the last person she'd tell. Also, Suzanne just handed in her thesis that afternoon. She left a note on it to have Jim e-mail her the next day. Somehow I doubt she said "give me an 'A' or I'll report you."

c) I think we agree that without some racial, sexual, or violent action on Jim's part toward Suzanne, the likelihood of him being fired over a dispute with a student are nil. If such an action occurred, Suzanne would have at least told someone about it. She apparently didn't.

d) Huge risk vs. reward, no evidence of risk to begin with, no evidence of planning (first thing someone who planned such a thing would do is establish an alibi), etc.

Again, your scenario is certainly possible, but very very improbable, IMO.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext