Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Amy J who wrote (86327)	1/10/2000 3:31:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (3) of 1573215

Amy - <When I take your two posts together, is there some type dependent relationship between being able to supply mature low-end CPUs and high-end 800's at the same time, that would impact Gateway?> Not that I'm aware of, at lest in a manufacturing sense. I don't see how the .18 ramp inhibited, to the first order, Intel's ability to supply .25 micron parts. At the moment there are .25 fabs, and .18 fabs. It has been posted here that GTW has said 1 week turnaround for PIII 800 systems. However, GTW also said they were having a hard time obtaining BX boards, and GTW is a "BX shop". They would need a good supply of BX boards to ship Coppermine systems, as well as the .25 systems. I have no idea what is going on w.r.t. the BX issue. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next