| Hi Buddy & all..... below does not require a comment from me :-) 
 Sunday, January 9, 2000
 
 Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
 
 There's a lot of gold news and GATA news in the latest
 "Midas" dispatch of GATA Chairman Bill "Midas" Murphy
 to his subscribers at www.LeMetropoleCafe.com, and so
 he has asked me to share it with you here.
 
 CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
 Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
 
 * * *
 
 By Bill "Midas" Murphy
 
 January 9, 2000
 
 The last several days have been loaded with GATA-
 related activity, correspondence, news stories, etc. It
 is clear that GATA is making progress toward our goal
 of finding out what is REALLY going on in the gold
 market and exposing that truth to gold market
 participants, the public, Congress, and the press.
 
 As you read this it will become very clear to you that
 all of our efforts continue to pay off. But it is
 tedious hard work, not that much different than a
 detective trying to find the proof to solve a crime. It
 is not glamorous; it is time-consuming, as many of you
 helping us know. But there are many of you, for which
 we are very grateful.
 
 On that note, Chris Powell, my GATA co-founder and our
 treasurer/secretary deserves a special pat on the back.
 He has been working tirelessly behind the scenes (on
 his own time and without any compensation), and as you
 will ascertain below, he has been especially effective.
 
 As you read the following correspondence, please keep
 in mind that we view all them with the Clinton
 administration's "Is" principle in mind. You know --
 What does "is" mean? Until we close all the wiggle-room
 loopholes, we will not be satisfied with the answers we
 are starting to get from the Federal Reserve and the
 Treasury Department; otherwise, they might come back at
 a later date and say, "Well, you never asked us THAT
 question!"
 
 As many of you know, GATA posed certain questions to
 Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and Treasury Secretary
 Lawrence Summers in an open letter in Roll Call on
 December 9, 1999. Prior to that time Powell had been
 working with Senator Dodd's office and had asked other
 questions. He and the senator just received the
 following:
 
 "DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
 "WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220
 
 "January 7, 2000
 
 "Dear Senator Dodd:
 
 "Thank you for your letter concerning questions from Mr.
 Chris Powell, managing editor of the Manchester Journal
 Inquirer, regarding the Federal Reserve Board and the
 Department of the Treasury.
 
 "Enclosed you will find responses to Mr. Powell's
 questions as they pertain to the Department of the
 Treasury.
 
 "If Mr. Powell needs clarification or has further
 questions, he should contact Mr. John Longbrake in our
 Public Affairs Office.
 
 "Sincerely,
 
 "Michelle A. Smith
 "Deputy Assistant Secretary / Public Affairs"
 
 "Q1: Do the Fed or the Treasury try to influence the
 stock, bond commodities and gold markets? If so, how?
 
 "A: The Treasury Department does not make any attempt
 to influence the stock, bond, commodities, or gold
 markets.
 
 "Q2: Do the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department
 have a policy toward the price of gold? If so, what is
 it?
 
 "A: The Treasury does not have any policy regarding the
 market price of gold. The Mint, however, pegs the price
 of the Golden American Eagle coin according to the
 London Metal Exchange base price. The charge for the
 coins are LME base plus 3 percent for 1 ounce, plus 5
 percent for 1/4 ounce, plus 9 percent for 1/10 ounce
 and mints to demand. Prior to 1971, however, the
 Treasury pegged the market price of gold.
 
 "Q3: Do the Fed or the Treasury trade in any financial
 instruments besides U.S. government bonds? If so, which
 ones and what do the Fed and the Treasury try to
 accomplish with their trading?
 
 "A: The Treasury Department does not trade Treasury
 securities. The Treasury only conducts issuance
 activities in Treasury securities and is considering
 whether to buy-back its securities in the market. In
 rare cases where the government receives securities,
 the Treasury's Bureau of the Public Digest engages a
 third part agent to sell the securities (see the answer
 to 7, below).
 
 "Q4: Have the Fed or the Treasury used foreign central
 banks, foreign banks, or foreign accounts over which
 they have custody or influence, or the Exchange
 Stabilization Fund to intervene in the stock, bond,
 commodities, or the gold markets?
 
 "A: The Treasury does not use foreign central banks,
 foreign banks, foreign accounts or the Exchange
 Stabilization Fund to intervene in the stock, bond,
 commodities, or the gold market.
 
 "Q5: Do the Fed or the Treasury trade in gold or in
 securities, futures contracts, or options that are
 related to gold, or otherwise seek to influence trading
 in gold? If so, how?
 
 "A: The Treasury Department does not trade in gold or
 futures contracts in order to influence the trading in
 gold.
 
 "Q6: Do the Fed or the Treasury lend or lease gold? If
 so, whose gold is it, where does it come from, for what
 purpose is it lent or leased, and under what terms is
 it lent or leased?
 
 "The Treasury Department does not engage in the lending
 or leasing of gold.
 
 "Q7: Do the Fed or the Treasury have or control
 brokerage accounts? If so, with which brokers, and what
 sort of trading is done with each? Where do the money
 and securities deposited with these brokers for the
 Fed's and the Treasury's accounts come from?
 
 "A: The Treasury Department maintains a brokerage
 account at Legg Mason Wood Walker Inc. in order to
 liquidate securities holdings that come into possession
 of the government. This facility is managed by the
 Bureau of the Public Debt and receives securities from
 any government agency to be sold. These securities may
 be received as gifts, as settlements, payments, etc.
 The only securities in this account are those awaiting
 sale. The Treasury does not conduct any purchasing
 activities through this account and does not have a
 portfolio account at any brokerage firm."
 
 * * *
 
 You will note that this Treasury Department statement
 says nothing about the Federal Reserve, and in
 answering Question 5 leaves out any mention about
 options. Leaving out options is a glaring omission.
 
 Meanwhile, GATA supporter Michael Bolser received the
 following from another Treasury official through his
 U.S. Representative, Charles Canady. They are the same
 answers. Michael writes:
 
 "Dear Mr. Powell:
 
 I have received an official Treasury Department
 response through my congressman, Charles Canady.
 
 "It is on letterhead, Dec. 17, 1999 and signed by Linda
 L. Robertson, Assistant Secretary for Legislative
 Affairs and Liaison.
 
 "You should know that her responses mirror those
 previously provided by the Federal Reserve working
 committee. She issues blanket denials to each of the
 six questions. Here are some highlights for your
 review:
 
 "'Treasury Department does not have any policy
 regarding the price of gold." (Except regarding
 American Eagle coin pricing.)
 
 "'Treasury Department does not trade in gold or futures
 contracts in order to influence the trading in gold."
 
 "'Treasury Department does not trade marketable
 Treasury securities or any other financial
 instruments."
 
 "'Treasury Department ... maintains a brokerage account
 at Legg, Mason, Wood, Walker  Inc. in order to
 liquidate securities holdings that come in to
 possession of the government."
 
 "'Treasury Department does not make any attempt to
 influence the stock, bond, or commodities markets.
 
 "'Treasury Department does not engage in the lending or
 leasing of gold.'"
 
 "Chris, I now have documents (as I expect you do also)
 from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department
 which essentially deny involvement in what GATA asserts
 is anti-trust activity.
 
 "These two positions from two government agencies are
 unequivocal statements of denial made to a U.S.
 Congressman on behalf of his constituent -- me. If you
 need copies of the correspondence, let me know.
 
 "If there has been action designed to influence the
 price of gold by the federal government, then there is
 also a significant cover up under way as well."
 
 "Goldbird1, the Deep Throat of the gold resistance,
 needs to beam even more light and heat on the specifics
 of everyday trading manipulations. As the momentum
 builds in this story, it will be his and other's
 informed leaks that confound and hamstring the
 opposition.
 
 "Kindest Regards,
 
 "Michael Bolser."
 
 * * *
 
 HOT OFF THE PRESS
 
 I just called up Michael to ask him about the Federal
 Reserve document that he referred to. I was NOT aware
 of one, so he faxed it to me.
 
 "Board of Governors
 "Of The Federal Reserve System
 "Washington, D.C. 20551
 
 "November 12, 1999
 
 "The Honorable Charles Canady
 "House of Representatives
 "Washington, D.C. 20515
 
 "Dear Congressman:
 
 Thank you for your letter of October 22 in which you
 requested answers to questions you received from your
 constituent, Mr. Michael Bolser, concerning various
 policies of the Federal Reserve and the Department of
 the Treasury.
 
 "I have enclosed a staff memorandum responding to the
 questions regarding the Federal Reserve. Please let us
 know if we can be of further assistance.
 
 "Sincerely,
 
 "Winthrop P. Hambley
 "Deputy Congressional Liaison"
 
 (The following enclosure was not written on Board of
 Governors stationary but on blank paper.)
 
 "Staff Memorandum Board of Governors of the Federal
 Reserve System.
 
 "November 1999.
 
 "Do the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the
 Treasury have a policy toward the price of gold? What
 is the policy?
 
 "The Federal Reserve does not have a policy toward the
 price of gold.
 
 "Do the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the
 Treasury trade in gold or securities, gold futures, or
 gold options, or otherwise influence trading in gold?
 
 "The Federal Reserve does not trade in gold or gold
 securities, gold futures, or gold options. Likewise, the
 Federal Reserve takes no action designed to influence
 trading in gold.
 
 "Do the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the
 Treasury trade in any financial instruments besides
 U.S. government bonds? If so, which ones and what do
 the Fed and the Treasury try to accomplish with their
 trading.
 
 "Virtually all the Federal Reserve's trading
 activities relate to U.S government securities. The
 Federal Reserve buys and sells U.S. government
 securities in the open markets (open market operations)
 in order to implement monetary policy. The Federal
 Reserve conducts such transactions in U.S. government
 securities both on an outright basis and under
 repurchase agreements. In addition, the Federal Reserve
 very recently has sold options on repurchase agreements
 in U.S. government securities to help address concerns
 in financial markets associated with the century date
 change.
 
 "From time to time the Federal Reserve, in cooperation
 with the Department of the Treasury, conducts operation
 in foreign currency. The purpose of these purchases and
 sales is to counter excessive pressure on the
 international value of the dollar. The Federal Reserve
 also carries out transactions in the U.S. foreign
 exchange market as an agent for foreign monetary
 authorities.
 
 "Do the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the
 Treasury have or control brokerage accounts? If so,
 with which brokers.
 
 "The Federal Reserve has no accounts with stockbrokers.
 
 "The Federal Reserve's transactions in government
 securities are conducted primarily through the book-
 entry system that the Federal Reserve maintains on
 behalf of the Treasury. In the book-entry system,
 depository institutions (such as commercial banks)
 maintain accounts with their local Federal Reserve
 Banks. These accounts record the ownership of the
 securities by their ultimate owners. In addition, the
 Federal Reserve maintains government securities
 accounts as the two major U.S. banks that are active in
 providing clearing services in U.S. government
 securities, the Bank of New York and Chase Manhattan
 Bank.
 
 "Do the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the
 Treasury try to influence the stock and commodity
 markets? If so, how?
 
 "The Federal Reserve does not try to influence the
 stock and commodity markets. The Federal Reserve's
 statutory objectives in conducting monetary policy are
 maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-
 term interest rates. Of course changes in the stance
 of monetary policy, and even public comments by Federal
 Reserve officials regarding monetary policy or economic
 conditions, affect markets, including the stock and
 commodity markets. For instance, a tightening of
 monetary policy designed to reduce inflationary
 pressures would likely reduce stock and commodity
 prices, other things equal.
 
 "Do the Federal Reserve Board and the Department of the
 Treasury lend or lease gold? If so, to whom and for
 what purpose?
 
 "Under the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, title to any gold
 acquired by the Federal Reserve is vested in the
 Department of the Treasury. Accordingly, the Federal
 Reserve Board has no holdings of gold that could be
 lent or leased and does not engage in any such
 transactions."
 
 * * *
 
 These answers are in much greater detail than we
 obtained from the Treasury, but they still leave wiggle
 room.
 
 For example, the last question does not say whether the
 Federal Reserve lends gold in behalf of the Treasury.
 It just says that they don't lend gold that they don't
 own. In addition, we have not asked the Fed or the
 Treasury about "forwards," so naturally they have not
 answered that one yet.
 
 In the weeks and months ahead we hope to have all our
 questions answered. If the Fed and Treasury deny any
 active involvement in any way or form, they are either
 lying or telling the truth. If they are telling the
 truth, then the bullion dealers cannot use a Federal
 Reserve/Treasury defense to say they manipulated the
 gold price at the instructions of the Federal
 Reserve/Treasury.
 
 That has been a worry of ours over the past year and
 the Fed/Treasury may be closing that excuse door for
 some of the bullion dealers down the road -- unless, of
 course, they are not giving us the straight scoop, in
 which case we will hold the Fed liable for damages.
 
 The more questions we ask, the more answers we get, the
 closer we get to proving what players are really behind
 the orchestration of the low gold price. Concrete
 smoking-gun evidence is out there. We will find it.
 
 The hoopla these past few days does not end there. On
 Friday the staff director for U.S. Rep. Sherrod Brown
 of Ohio, called to ask me how we were getting along and
 what was the status of our potential legal course of
 action. This staff director, Dave Savolaine, was up to
 date on the Peter Hambro/Bank of England/UK Treasury
 correspondence, the Roll Call open letter to Fed
 Chairman Greenspan and Secretary Summers, etc. He asked
 me to keep him informed of news on our end.
 
 Rep. Brown's main interest is health care, but MANY of
 his constituents have been flooding him about the GATA
 questions and the issues we are raising about the gold
 market. Rep. Brown and Dave Savolaine were responding
 to their constituents. Very impressive and nice going
 Cafe and GATA members out there. Your efforts are
 paying off. This is evidence that we can all make a
 difference. (Rep. Brown is a member of the Commerce and
 International Relations Committee.)
 
 Then yesterday Jim Bruce sent GATA the following
 Reuters wire story about Secretary Summers. Our
 presence is being felt and the press is finally
 starting to ask questions.
 
 "Summers Says U.S. Not Selling Any Gold Reserves."
 
 "11:24 a.m. ET , January 8, 2000
 
 "BOSTON (Reuters) -- The United States has not sold any
 of its gold reserves and has no plans to do so, U.S.
 Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers said on Saturday.
 
 "I categorically deny assertions that U.S. gold
 reserves were being sold off or that there is any plan
 to sell them off," Summers told reporters on the
 sidelines of an economics conference.
 
 "His denial came amid talk in the gold markets that some
 of the weakness in the gold price over recent years may
 have been caused by direct U.S. sales of gold.
 
 "The International Monetary Fund, for its part, has
 begun to sell its gold to raise cash to pay for debt
 relief for some of the world's poorest nations. But the
 gold never actually reaches the market; in a
 complicated transaction, the fund sells its gold at
 market prices to member countries that owe it cash. The
 members then use that cash to repay their obligations
 to the fund.
 
 "The deal creates windfall profits for the IMF because,
 under a quirk of international finances, IMF gold is
 valued at some $48 per ounce, while the market price is
 around $285.
 
 "The idea of off-market gold sales was hatched as a way
 to placate those who feared that direct sales of IMF
 gold could drive prices lower and hurt the very
 countries the debt relief is designed to help. Some
 poor debtor countries are also gold producers."
 
 * * *
 
 The following Associated Press suggests that the
 international financial adviser Martin Armstrong has a
 rough go ahead of him. Previous to this story, his
 attorneys were ordered to return the money they
 received from Armstrong or his firm in preparing his
 defense. Now he has been ordered to turn in $16 million
 of his personal assets.
 
 I don't have a clue what the real story is here, but it
 disturbs me greatly that the government is taking away
 a man's right to defend himself with proper legal
 representation. Good lawyers have to be paid. This has
 to be an incredibly complicated financial legal case. A
 public defender would have to study finance for a year
 before he could be of any help to Armstrong.
 
 "What is worse is that I suspect the government is
 doing all this on purpose so that the bullion banks,
 such as Republic Bank, do not get their records
 subpoenaed. It would seem that the government wants to
 smother any chance Armstrong has to bring facts out
 into the open that might go against the big-money New
 York crowd. First Edward Safra was silenced. I mean
 really silenced! Is that also the big boys' way of
 neutralizing Armstrong? The United States of China is
 at work once again when it comes to going against the
 cronies of the establishment.
 
 "Friday January 7, 7:04 pm Eastern Time
 
 "Market Guru Ordered To Return $16 million"
 
 "NEW YORK (AP) -- A judge on Friday ordered renowned
 market forecaster Martin A. Armstrong to produce $16
 million of gold bars and rare antiquities in an attempt
 to recover the assets of investors who were bilked out
 of about $1 billion.
 
 "Armstrong, 50, founder of Princeton Economics
 International, violated a court order to turn over the
 valuables to a court-appointed receiver, Judge Richard
 Owen in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan ruled.
 
 "The judge ordered him to produce them by Tuesday at 3
 p.m.
 
 "Prosecutors believe Armstrong has 102 bars of gold, a
 $750,000 bust of Julius Caesar, hundreds of rare coins,
 a bronze helmet and other antiquities.
 
 "In addition, Armstrong's ex-girlfriend, Tina Mustra,
 who also is his executive assistant at Princeton
 Economics, testified Friday that she helped Armstrong
 remove company records from their Princeton, N.J.,
 offices shortly before they were raided last September
 by FBI agents.
 
 "'The testimony of Ms. Mustra (supports) that Mr.
 Armstrong has been personally involved in the taking
 and secreting of these items,' Judge Owen said in
 signing his order.
 
 "On Thursday, attorneys for the receiver searched
 Armstrong's spacious vacation home in Long Beach
 Island, N.J., but said it had been cleaned out.
 
 "Behind some books on the top shelf of a bookcase, they
 found a bar of fine Swiss silver, they said. They also
 found some packaging for antique coins, complete with
 auction slips, and two small coins.
 
 "'It is overwhelming evidence the coins are in his
 possession,' said Alan Cohen, an attorney for
 O'Melveny & Meyers and the receiver in the case.
 
 "Armstrong, who is free on a $5 million bond, had no
 comment following the hearing, but his attorney,
 Lawrence S. Feld, said, 'Mr. Armstrong has authorized
 me to say that he will turn over whatever is in his
 possession.'
 
 "Had Armstrong not signaled that he was willing to
 comply, U.S. marshals were standing by to arrest him.
 
 "Armstrong has pleaded innocent to charges of fraud
 brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
 Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S.
 Attorney.
 
 "Armstrong owes almost $1 billion to some 100 Japanese
 corporate investors. His companies, including Princeton
 Economics and Cresvale International Ltd. in Tokyo, had
 raised money from investors and promised to repay the
 debt, plus interest.
 
 "Instead of investing the money in safe bonds, as he
 promised, Armstrong made risky bets on currencies and
 derivatives. Only $46 million has been recovered to
 repay investors.
 
 "Cresvale filed for bankruptcy last month and its
 chairman, Akira Setogawa, was indicted for tax evasion.
 Setogawa also has admitted giving rebates to Japanese
 companies who continued to invest with Armstrong."
 
 * * *
 
 How bad is the stench in the gold market? The following
 is a Kitco comment that was emailed to me:
 
 "Date: Fri Jan 07 2000 01:48 GO GOLD (Ashanti news)
 ID 428144: Copyright -- 1999 GO GOLD/Kitco Inc. All
 rights reserved.
 
 "I was lucky enough to spend some time over Xmas with a
 Standard Bank employee who told me that as primary
 lender to Ashanti, they were very close to going under.
 The bank, that is. If the Bank of England had not
 stepped in to underwrite Standard in return for their
 not calling in their debts from Ashanti, then Standard
 would no longer be around. Standard had no option other
 than to comply, since the BOE made it clear that they
 would have had to stand in line with other creditors,
 and they would never get all their money back.
 
 "Now why would the Bank of England involve itself in
 corporate issues like this -- unless they were scared
 of Ashanti not being around any more to deliver that
 lovely gold into the market. I just think the whole
 thing STINKS. I just cannot believe that the powers
 that be out there are quietly manipulating the market
 while publicly and very loudly pushing the open and
 free markets. I eagerly await their downfall."
 
 That very same day, a Cafe member told me that he heard
 that Barrick Gold is going to move in on the
 significant assets of Ashanti and that an announcement
 would be made in the next couple of weeks.
 
 The same Cafe member told me he felt that is why the
 gold price has been ratcheted down once again. Goldman
 Sachs wants this deal consummated to get it off the
 hook, as it has received horrendous conflict of
 interest publicity -- even from the likes of the
 Financial Times in London. To do so Goldman Sachs needs
 the price of gold lowered so that some short covering
 can be done on Ashanti's behalf.
 
 My feelings for Barrick Gold are well known to all of
 you. They are louses of the first order and one of the
 worst examples of industry leadership in the history of
 corporations. Their excess hedging strategies and
 complicity with bullion dealers such as J.P. Morgan and
 Goldman Sachs are causing untold suffering to so many
 in the gold industry. Their executives brag how great
 they are, yet while many stock prices are making new
 highs, Barrick's share price is mired right above 52-
 week LOWS at 17 and change. Very impressive!
 
 Goldman Sachs was lead adviser to Ashanti. On Friday,
 Bridge News reported the following from Accra, Ghana:
 
 "The group treasurer of Shanti Goldfields company has
 quit her job, in the wake of the company being wrong-
 footed late last year in its forecast of the world gold
 price. Mona Caesar-Addo, 37, who was in charge of the
 company's hedging activities gave a month's notice of
 here resignation on Nov. 30 and subsequently left with
 the entire treasury staff, Bridge learned today."
 
 I'd love to chat with this widowed mother of two,  Mona
 Caesar-Addo, some time. I wonder what she has to say
 about the advice Goldman Sachs gave her.
 
 The Barrick/Ashanti story is only what I hear from a
 good source. It will be interesting to see if it plays
 out.
 
 * * *
 
 The gold loans are around 10,000 tonnes, the monthly
 supply/demand deficit is around 150 tonnes per month,
 the big gold shorts are trapped, gold demand is running
 at record levels, bond yields are soaring due to
 inflation fears, base metals have risen sharply, the
 economic story of the day is global economic growth,
 and all that is superb news for present and future gold
 demand. On top of that, the U.S. money supply has
 expanded dramatically.
 
 All this and the gold price goes nowhere to lower. It
 is being manipulated and orchestrated lower. How clear
 can that be?
 
 The good news is that the perpetrators of this fraud
 are slowly being found out. As each month goes by they
 run out of future massive sources of supply to hold the
 gold price down. It is only a matter of a little time
 before they do run for the proverbial "them thar" hills
 and the price of gold begins to advance toward its fair
 equilibrium price of $600 per ounce.
 
 -END-
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Get a $100 cash bonus when you open an E*TRADE account today!
 Click here to open your account at the #1 place to invest online.
 click.egroups.com
 
 -- Create a poll/survey for your group!
 -- egroups.com
 |