SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (86478)1/11/2000 12:46:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (2) of 1572258
 
Paul,

You claimed that I said Intel's estimates were 130 W at 600 MHz?

Where did I say this? I am asking this question in simple English, show me where I said 130 watts at 600 MHz!

In one post I asked you this with regard to current status of Merced, not initial estimates.

"How many Watts does Merced burns at 600 MHz? 150W ????"

Do you see the question marks, that means I am asking a question. Do you also see that question is asked in present form (does, not did)?

I know you already know what I have said consistantly over and over! Initial estimates, before the chip was running, where 130 Watts at 700 MHz. That has proven to be too low. I do not know the CURRENT status, that is why I asked. This is the 4th time I am saying this. Do you understand this Paul?

You said I was deceptive and also said initial estimates were 130 W at 600 MHz. I NEVER SAID THIS Show me where I said this. Show me, show me, show me!

Paul, you continued arrogance in this very simple matter is indeed embarrassing. You are unwilling to admit to a mistake you have clearly made. What bugs me is that you made a mistake and accused me of being "deceptive" based on your mistake. And now you are unwilling to admit to your mistake and apologize.

This is a truly a sorry and sad display of your character. There is no other way of putting it.

Mani
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News