SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David R. Lehenky who wrote (926)4/23/1997 5:32:00 PM
From: David R. Lehenky   of 10309
 
What Are the Implications of the PLX I2O Product Announcements?
---------------------------------------------------------------

I'll start with the easiest stuff first ;).

What is the i960Cx?

This refers to 2 members of the i960 family of integrated RISC I/O
processors. It is the lower-end of the i960 performance scale.
It has smaller on-chip cache than other i960 chips. Main features
of the i960Cx include 1KB RAM, DMA controller, and interrupt
controller. It does not have any timer/counters and uses separate
address/data buses. Without other support chips, it cannot function
as a I2O IOP, as the i960RP/RD can.

What is the i960Hx?

This refers to 3 members of the i960 family of integrated RISC I/O
processors. It is the high-end of the i960 performance scale. The
top-of-the-line i960HT is rated at 150 MIPS! Main features of the
i960Hx include 16KB Icache, 8KB Dcache, 2KB RAM, 2 32-bit timers,
and an interrupt controller. It does not have a DMA controller and
uses separate address/data buses. Without other support chips, it
cannot function as a I2O IOP, as the i960RP/RD can.

What is the difference between the i960RP and i960RD?

Speed. The i960RD is a clock-doubled version of the RP, i.e. the
internal CPU clock on the RD runs at twice the frequency, 66 Mhz,
as the RP. Both the RP and RD run the external bus at 33 Mhz.

What is the difference between the i960Hx/Cx and the i960RP/RD?

The i960RP/RD is essentially an i960Jx with some SPECIAL features.
The i960Jx has 4KB Icache, 2KB Dcache, 1KB RAM, interrupt
controller, and 2 32-bit timers; it is rated at 31 MIPS at 33 Mhz.

The SPECIAL features, in a nut shell, are a complete PCI-to-PCI
bridge unit, I2O messaging unit, 3-channel DMA controller, DRAM/
SRAM/ROM memory controller, I2C bus interface unit, and advanced
programmable interrupt controller (APIC).

What is the PLX 9080?

The 9080 is a PCI-to-local bus interface chip, with 2 DMA channels,
and a I2O messaging unit. It is basically a subset of the i960RP/RD
special features, without any processor. It allows ANY processor,
with ANY local bus design (e.g. VME, NUbus, Sbus) up to 40 Mhz, to
interface to a PCI bus. It also provides the messaging unit required
for the processor to function as an I2O IOP, like the i960RP/RD.

What does the PLX I2O Manager Software Provide?

This software provides the MINIMUM I2O IOP functionality for ANY CPU.
It does not require a RTOS. It does require a processor, memory,
and the PLX 9080 PCI interface. It is available in compiled binary
form for the i960Cx/Hx and the 401GF PowerPC only. For other CPUs,
a source code license is available, but the customer most do the
porting/debug.

How does WIND's IxWorks fit into the PLX product announcement?

PLX is working with WIND to add PLX 9080 support to IxWorks. In
other words, IxWorks will be able to run on the PLX 9080/i960Cx/Hx
combo, as well as the i960RP/RD. This will allow even higher
performance applications of IxWorks than currently available on
the i960RD, but with some other important limitations (see below).

What differentiates IxWorks from the PLX I2O Manager?

The PLX I2O Manager provides only the I2O functionality needed
to communicate I2O messages to/from the host processor. In other
words, it takes care of the host-to-IOP message interface, in a
minimal implementation. IxWorks provides a robust implementation
of the same host-to-IOP message interface. In addition, it provides
all the underpinnings for the device driver API. This is the aspect
of I2O/IxWorks that allows hardware vendors to implement host-OS
independent device drivers. Next to system I/O performance, this
device driver API is the most important aspect of the I2O
architecture. It includes a sophisticated queued-DMA implementation
that optimizes the use of DMA channel resources by multiple devices.
Device drivers written by hardware vendors to run on the i960RP/RD
REQUIRE this API. In order for these device drivers to be used
without IxWorks, another RTOS, with the PLX I2O Manager
functionality AND the device driver API, including compatible DMA
services, would have to be provided.

What differentiates the i960RP/RD from a PLX 9080/other-CPU hardware
configuration?

One obvious difference is that the PLX 9080/other-CPU solution
requires two chips, while the i960RP/RD remains the ONLY single-
chip I2O IOP implementation. This is a significant cost advantage
for any I2O design. PLX is pricing the 9080, in 20,000/year
quantity, at $24. This does not include the I2O Manager software.

The second, less obvious, feature unique to the i960RP/RD is the
PCI-to-PCI bridge capability. This is the functionality that allows
the i960RP/RD to extend the PCI bus, thereby providing more PCI
slots than would otherwise be possible. For all intents and
purposes, this is a "most have" feature for applications where
the IOP is on the motherboard or the I2O adapter card implements
its own secondary PCI bus.

What other advantages does the i960RP/RD-IxWorks solution have when
compared to the PLX 9080/other-CPU+PLX I2O Manager configuration?

In a word, Tornado for IxWorks, unless the PLX design is using
either the i960Hx/Cx (IxWorks can be used) or the other-CPU is
running VxWorks ;).

Where do the PLX products make sense?

I can see the PLX 9080/i960Hx/Cx combo being used with IxWorks when
a device adapter needs maximum horsepower. Also, I can see
legacy designs that use some processor already, but want to move
quickly to minimum I2O compliance. Lastly, designs that are already
committed to either proprietary OS implementations, or a competing
RTOS.

Hope this helps!

-Dave Lehenky
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext