SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Quickdraw who wrote (12439)1/12/2000 9:25:00 PM
From: charred  Read Replies (1) of 14627
 
Great update Quickdraw, but remember, talking to the company, you will hear all the positive stuff.

<<<Barb indicated the 3% NSR was considered as standard and should not be considered as onerous.>>>>, as we showed Barb is not correct, along with 25 million dollar payment, it is onerous. Maybe she never sat down and worked it out.

<<<<She noted that the 3% is off the value of what is mined. >>>>, exactly, but this what will make the IRR lower. When someone is going to take over the company they look at the IRR, and than place a bid. But here they will have to buyout the owner, the shareholders and still be stuck with this NSR, this will be all factored in. She doesn't see a problem, but wait until the report comes out. The NSR will take off a 1 or 2 bucks off the stock price. This is why I say there is a lot of promotion here. The companies who will take over PFG will look at the NSR, and will give a lower bid. Barb, we will wait and see.

<<<<<The formula I used in an earlier post seemed to bother her, in particular the $30US figure. She suggested the range could typically be anywhere from $10US to $90US.>>>,, 90US, wake up Barb. 30US is the better number. Why, add in the purchase price and the NSR. She was upset because it's the truth. In addition, this NSR must be paid during payback. Too much.

Thanks for calling and sharing the information.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext