SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (73427)1/13/2000 12:46:00 PM
From: Michael Bakunin   of 132070
 
Fred: (1) Roll revenue growth (i.e., last four quarters over previous four quarters) to squeeze out seasonality, then Intel's last three quarters say 4%..3%..2%.. (another 2% this quarter, probably). Whew! Scorch me with revenue growth! -g- (2) A thought experiment: say Intel grows revs and earns 25% a year until it's "too big" (I figured, 'til its revs make up ten times as much of 5%-slow-growing US GDP as they do now), at which point, it'll grow with GDP, and boost dividend payout to a befitting amount, say 50% of earnings. What's the total return embedded in this optimistic scenario? Ans: 11.6%. (3) An anecdote about bandwidth: my father, whom easily could afford it, is cancelling his cable modem. 56k was fine. Besides, in a broadband world, the CPU is not the bottleneck. (4) You want competition? In a word, Via. Intel won't be able to sue their way out of this one. (conclusion) I think you're wrong about Intel's prospects. If you're right after all, hey, enjoy those 12% returns. -g- -mb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext