Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles R who wrote (86971)	1/13/2000 7:12:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) of 1572474

Chuck, <This indicates flat to slightly negative growth in the core Microprocessor business. Do you understand what this means?> If I remember correctly, Intel shifted some business out of IABG into other groups during the course of 1999. Certainly the near 100% growth in revenue from the "All Other" category can't be due to self-contained growth alone, can it? <Finally, one thing that slid by was that apparently this quarter had 14 weeks compared to the typical 13 weeks in a quarter. That means possibly one full week of extra revenues compared to normal.> Wrong. In the CC, the extra week will be tacked onto Q1 2000. Q4 1999 was still 13 week period. <As I have been saying on this thread AMD will do a lot better than Intel this Q.> You also said that Intel would miss. Face it, Chuck, you were wrong. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next