Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (87216)	1/14/2000 12:55:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) of 1572906

PB, From your link on Cramer: <The revaluation also squeezed the shorts who thought the only thing that would matter would be the earnings number that printed. Some of them are still fighting a rear-guard action to minimize the posted earnings, claiming that it was inflated by Intel's brilliant cash management and its gains on investments. But in an era where CMGI (CMGI:Nadaq - news) trades at a $50 billion market cap because of those kinds of investments, it seems a little silly to expect that Intel will be penalized for its incubation profits. > Cramer makes good points and I can see that he has much better pulse on trading psychology than I do. (now it doesn't take much for that since I am not a big-time trader). Having said that look at companies like ALSC and SIII which have massive (and I mean MASSIVE) earnings from investments and the street doesn't give a damn. I was smart enough to know Intel may not go down after earning and not bet against it. So, I have no interest in what happened yesterday other than what it means to AMD (which is very very good). Congrats on the runup to all the INTC longs. Ditto for AMD longs. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next