SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : USRX
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (17624)4/24/1997 4:53:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen   of 18024
 
Fred, I know my few shares/votes will be meaningless by themselves, but just the same, everyone's shares/votes together will mean something: They will either be a majority Yes or a majority No. Everyone who cares one way or the other and holds shares should vote. Saying "your vote will be meaningless" only undermines the voting process. By that reasoning why should anyone vote in elections for public officials, since each person's vote by itself is statistically meaningless?

I say this because when you say, "The big investors who have the most to gain or lose from the deal will be voting YES.", you don't know that. Casey will be voting yes, and perhaps you personally know some big investors who also will be voting yes. But you don't know how all the big investors are going to vote. Keep in mind that we have seen that "The Street" apparently doesn't like this deal. Those that were the most negative on it have probably dumped their shares, which has caused the share price erosion. But we simply don't know how the new-comers feel.

DK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News