Allan,
>>>
Re: It appears he never made much more than a brief mention of Qualcomm in that issue. Also, didn't the WSJ say that it wasn't mentioned again for three or so years.
Gilder initially placed QCOM on his recommended list on September 24, 1996 at $5.00/share. My back issues only go back to October '98 but I find QCOM mentioned in Gilder's commentaries in October '98, Nov.'98, Dec.'98, and Jan.'99. Qualcomm is then highlighted and featured as, "the prime call of this letter" in the April '99 issue, at $20/share. I think this is sufficient to consider Gilder, "getting QCOM right".
>>>
You miss my point but I expected such a response. Read the article in the WSJ.
>>>
Re: 3 days to receive an email, yes an email, to get my password. Huh??
Today, mid-morning, you will have access to the January issue at the same time as every other subscriber with a computer and modem at Gilder's web site. Duh??
>>>
Ahhhaaahhaaaa, I love you too Allan. Again, you missed the point.
>>>
Re: Also, didn't I read that he is advising Merrill now.
Gilder covered that in his subscriber forum, it amounts to something like four conference calls a year and he reiterated that his primary obligation will always be to his subscribers.
>>>
Uhh, OK. Whatever you say. |
