The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stuart T who wrote (86684)	1/16/2000 10:52:00 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (2) of 90042

Some people may be annoyed at our continuing this discussion, but after all it is a quiet market time, so not much harm to it. I agree with you that The Donald Trumps of this world could cause much grief to anyone they were out to get, including using the courts. I must say, though, that this sounds awfully much like "harassment," the very thing that Tim has accused others of. I am interested in this statement you made: From what I know, there appears to be enough basis to bring a case and withstand a motion for summary judgment, thereby allowing the case to go to the jury. Are you saying that this "basis" would arise from comments or opinions expressed on an internet chat line? Within the limits of your discretion, could you expand on this a little? Could you give an example of a comment or opinion that could make one legally liable for monetary civil damages, at least to the point of sending the matter to a jury? As I said before, I think would be of general interest to a great many people who participate on sites like SI. Thanks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next