The Critical Investing Workshop Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mslawyer who wrote (831)	1/17/2000 1:47:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (2) of 35685

Jacobs was clear, he wanted a stock price under 100 per share he wanted a stock affordable by the masses his masses just took a mild skewer thru the ribs personally got 3-5 small investor friends complaining about underwater another split would be an easy deal to pass through what the heck would the QCOM Board care? well within authorization limits would render share price to be 75-85 per share sounds good to me Jacobs has taken some PR shit from media in last couple weeks I doubt he enjoyed much of it momentum is gone temporarily a split would lift momentum but nothing will save us this early spring from the "beartrap" / Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next