SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Process Boy who wrote (87871)1/18/2000 10:17:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) of 1574751
 
PB Monday, Jan 17 2000 7:01PM ET
To: Bill Jackson (who wrote)
more on the yahoo thread about silicon

< Previous | Next > [ First | Last | Msg List ]

Reply

Notched Gate, someone can help?
by: FactFirst
1/17/00 6:46 pm
Msg: 97959 of 97963
A few days back I posted a report on Intel?s new tech of Notched Gate that is claimed to help
reduce the transistor gate length from 0.13 down to 0.10 micron, increase the drive current by
10%, reduce the operating voltage to 1.2-1.5V, and reduce the current leakage so that the
old-aged PIII core has really got a shot of life-saving stimulant and can move over 800+ Mhz at
0.18 micron now. eocenter.com

On the other hand, The Register has dug up some dirt on the Cumine for its failed multiple
sleeping modes, and Intel has admitted the current leakage problem:"While our manufacturing
processes get smaller and smaller (.25 micron to .18 micron ) the widths of the channels between
trace lines gets narrower. As a side effect, the current leakage is amplified." See
theregister.co.uk

But I could not have a response and there are still three things puzzling me:

1. The notched gate tech is claimed to reduce the current leakage problem, but the problem
remains. Why? Is it because its advantage of reducing the current leakage is canceled by an
increased amount of leakage from 0.13 micron gate to 0.10 gate?

2. Current Cumine core voltage is 1.65V (
intel.com ), more than 0.1V larger than the
above operating voltage 1.2-1.5V. Is the operating voltage the same as core voltage? If it is, is the
increased voltage supposed to alleviate the leakage problem?

3. The yield of Cumine still needs improvement, does it have something to do with the current
leakage problem?

Some Techie help.

Thanks


Bill
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext