Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (87887)	1/18/2000 11:31:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) of 1575046

Bill - <I speculate that when you make a feature like a notch that is .1 at the bottom there will be some that cut to .09 .08 etc as well as a few that are .11 .12 etc. Whatever there will be some process scatter.> Bill, there is most likely comparable poly feature size scatter in any .18 process, stipulating that I am not commenting specifically on your numbers above at all. Who knows? Intel's process scatter may even be better than un-notched poly. However, these things are left to speculation, and otherwise some form of competitive analysis. <In the absence of truth speculation abounds.> I can't help this. I'm going to give this up. I'll leave you free to speculate on the nature of leakage current. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next