SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (24612)1/19/2000 12:05:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) of 26163
 
As CarlW would say: TOO FUNNY! And too typical of Pugs: you make a mess of things and then you blame it all on somebody else.

Now the atty signs off on the stamped copy.

What rubbish. I'm looking at a copy of the Bizwire complaint. There's a visible stamp on the first page. It says:

ORIGINAL FILED
99 APR 26 PM 2:07
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, U.S. District Court
Northern District of California

There's nothing to indicate that a process server was involved in any way with the presentation of the complaint to the court.

Neither is there any attorney's signature on that page. There is one on the last page, with the same date, no time. Logical to assume, of course, that it was signed before it was stamped; makes no sense to do it the other way round.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News