PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN)

PABN 0.00001000

0.0%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ColleenB who wrote (42561)	1/19/2000 9:09:00 PM
From: PatP	Read Replies (2) of 43774

No, I don't think PCModem is confused. Troubled maybe, but not confused [wink]. I think he fully comprehends the seriousness of John A. Schmitz' NASD discipline. The comment that surprises me is his notion that the victim should sue the NASD for not prosecuting Schmitz. I'm not sure that such a cause of action exists.... The NASD is a private association which enforces its rules through disciplinary proceedings. To make such a statement indicates to me that he feels quite strongly about misconduct of this nature, as I am sure most of us do. However, as he goes on to point out, without all of the facts it is not possible to understand the full extent of what transpired outside of the limited context of the statement in the NASD document. We can only speculate. I believe the NASD disciplinary action, i.e. the document, speaks for itself as to the events charged. A fine, debarrment and restitution ordered by one's professional licensing organization carry with them a tremendous stigma.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next