SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc
ATHM 23.27+0.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (19045)1/19/2000 11:26:00 PM
From: E. Davies  Read Replies (1) of 29970
 
Or, do you want to KISS it nice and quick, delivering a high bandwidth platform with stupid network attributes

Your preference here is clear, however I'd be curious to hear you take the other side for a moment. Does it really work to simply hang the users on the internet? No network management? No caching? What things are lost with "nice & quick"? I'm truly uncertain.

You've just described the Internet, which has upwards of 6,000 networks connecting together using open internetworking standards.

That wasn't the question I posed. What I'm talking about is duplicate networks where each ISP is required to run its own link between each headend and "the internet" (in whatever form). Instead of one heavy duty link for all the users of that headend there would be 10 smaller ones each attempting to size itself for the capacity based on the number of subscribers they have at the moment. Seems illogical to me.

Increasingly, subscribers want speed and the option to go wherever they want go without binding terms, whether that's AOL, Home, or elsewhere.

@home already provides that. What can other ISP's (excluding AOL) provide that would make consumers choose them over @home? Where will the battleground be when MSPG tries to steal away @home customers? I personally don't see any way that they can (except for SOHO type apps unless @work gets it's act together).

Finally in regards to the question "How hard is it to duplicate @home?" I ask about the management of the network down to the user. My understanding (though I'm still fuzzy) is that though the MSO provides the link, @home controls and manages the network all the way down to the users modem. In essense you might say that @home is leasing the wires similar to how they lease backbone capacity from AT&T.
If true- how can you have multiple managers of a single network? I'm honestly not even sure what "network managment" is- but I know that your average company spends a great deal of money hiring significant numbers of employees to manage internal networks. It ain't easy even if only one group is in charge.

Bottom line: I've never answered the eternal question "What is @home anyway?". But I'm still trying...

Eric
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext