SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (88576)1/20/2000 5:57:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) of 1576016
 
Tench, re:<AMD's priority is to hurt Intel more than to make the most amount of money. Either that, or AMD is more demand-limited than I thought.>

Obviously it is more demand limited, based on the inventory numbers that Sanders gave. IMO, the price discrepancy between the top end (700 - 800 MHz) and the middle (550 - 650) is way beyond normal historical relationships. When the 486DX2-66 came out, it was the fastest chip on the block and you could buy a motherboard/cpu combo for $600.

If the ASP was $245 for Q4, then AMD must have been forced to sell 75% of their chips at the two lowest speed grades (500 and 550). My guess is that demand for a 700 MHz Athlon is twice as high at $475 as it is at $700. People and companies are willing to spend $200 to get 100 higher MHz, but not $400.

As for Q1, I expect 1.5M Athlons will be sold at an ASP of $220. If the K6-2+ is available in volume by mid February above 500 MHz, I expect K6 volume to be 3.5M at $60 ASP. If K6-2+ is not timely, I expect 3M K6's at $50 ASP.

Scenario 1: 1.5M Athlon @220 = 330M, 3.5M K6 @ $60 = $210M
Scenario 2: 1.5M Athlon @220 = 330M, 3M K6 @ $50 = $150M

Scenario 1 gives a small increase to revenue for the CPG group, scenario 2 gives a small decrease.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext