SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas Mercer-Hursh who wrote (15760)1/21/2000 3:08:00 AM
From: Dinesh  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
Hi Thomas

Re: If anything, I would guess that ORCL was more vulnerable there to a technology shift, e.g., if OORDBMS started to become the thing to have

Now, an OORDBMS would be an interesting thing to
have. While we've been hearing so much about pure OO dbms',
Oracle has been adding some pretty features such as
Packages and Types. Some programmers even swear by them.

I tend to view Databases as where the rubber meets the road.
There is seldom any room for an "ideal" implementation. Not
considering small installations.

Microsoft SQL Server is pretty good thing at the low end.
It does the job, it assumes so little of the user, and
it's "integrated" with other apps. The UI is familiar.

Oracle offers a good compromise between scalability, speed
and robustness. It's not the fastest, not the purest, not
the most innovative but it is very very practical.

DB2 is only for those who can afford it. But it's truly
awesome.

Informix has certain strengths in terms of performance
but their tools suck. In any event it is not likely to be
a dominant player this decade.

Sybase - I don't know if it still around. Just kidding.

-Dinesh
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext