SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.847-0.2%3:50 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Wexler who wrote (6239)1/21/2000 5:25:00 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (3) of 10293
 
Dear Bill: I'm sticking by my advice that techs should be sold while prices are high, high, high and the money shifted to money markets, CDs, and the stocks of dividend-paying, boring value stocks (particularly financials and consumer durables) while those prices are low, low, low.

Its hard to dispute you on this, but my problem is the taxes. I and I suspect many old timers like me have HUGE unrecognized capital gains. At a minimum we will pay 20% capital gains taxes at the Federal level. So the market pulls back 20% we are only even, say it pulls back 30% ok we can pick up or save 10%. Then what. We gotta know when and where to buy. Personally, in the foreseeable future I just cant see a pullback exceeding 30% and even that is less likely in my judgement then a 20% pullback. I am not arguing with you just thinking my thoughts out loud. Like you, I have a nice X myself and wouldnt want to lose it, on the other hand there are no CD's that allow people to live a decent retirement. So I am in a quandry. I think I am rather conservative, I have no margin, no personal debt of any kind, about 40% of my portfolio is in Fixed income securities, about 15% in cash and the balance in common stocks with probably 80% of that in Techs. What do you think? JDN
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext