SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kunal Taravade who wrote (2844)6/12/1996 6:41:00 PM
From: Janice Shell   of 58324
 
Kunal--I don't really have a comment, but I do have some questions. You're not quite right to say that the stock didn't react to the NEC announcement: it was off, what?, about 1 1/2, and then up 1 1/4 ten minutes later. Then it began to fall. I don't think this deal was necessarily factored into anything; we'd heard a lot about the IBM agreement in advance, but the official notice pumped the stock 6 points. There were rumors that IOMG was in talks with NEC, but I believe they weren't very widespread. What I'd like to know is: who's selling? Why? What's the point? Pace the financial press, IOMG isn't Diana, OCCF, PRST, or, God forbid, IDID. Not by a longshot. But to return to the point: today, as yesterday, the bond market went to hell toward the end of the session. Okay, so they seem not to have price inflation to worry about, but the case is still out on wage inflation. It wouldn't be a bond market if it weren't hysterical about SOMETHING. As a result, it appears that more "speculative" stocks got hit. I think it's totally unfair, but who listens to me? Janice.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext