Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.10

+2.3%

Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (97000)	1/21/2000 9:39:00 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (3) of 186894

Paul, I recall that the CYRIX 486 did indeed have only a 1 K cache - and NO FPU - which made it effectively a 386 with a small cache. Cyrix started as a math co-processor company. Their initial FPU implementation was better than Intel's, so it seems unlikely that they did not use it on their 486 designs. The ST web page which I pointed to shows all Cyrix 486's with 8K L1 and an FPU. Table2 : ST486DX family ST486DX ST486DX2 ST486DX4 Cache* 8kbyte 8kbyte 8kbyte Fuchi- Who loves Cyrix innovations

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next