SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : GWRX Leader in Smart Phone Market
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: N. Saliba who wrote ()1/22/2000 12:16:00 PM
From: stomper  Read Replies (1) of 960
 
Interesting, from (ahem) Yahoo:

In the ON24 audio interview the GWRX representative, a lady named Rhonda who is the the VP of Marketing, specifically stated that the WAP licensing program is NOT EXPECTED TO ADD SIGNIFICANT TOP LINE REVENUE to GWRX and that in order to be fair to the little guy in some cases the license will in fact be FREE to companies who have less than 1 Million in revenue. How does the reality of this financial information equate to the huge increase in price over the past few days? If in fact this information is true and that the licensing program is NOT going to add significant income to GWRX then this stock has been run up by the momentum daytraders and will very possibly headed for a big pullback when this key financial information is further analyzed by wise investors.

If you want to hear what I heard then just listen to the brief 2 minute interview at ON24 and make your own judgement on this. You can go to www.ON24.com and then put GWRX in the Search to retrieve the brief interview.

As an adjunct to the above statement, it is interesting to notice that in the www.RADIOWALLSTREET.com interview of this same lady VP from GWRX she conveniently never mentions the word FREE or the NO SIGNIFICANT TOP LINE REVENUE EXPECTED as a result of future licensing agreements. Did another VP nudge her and tell her for the sake of our soring stock price please consider not re-mentioning this honest and forthright information about lack of huge revenue expected from these licensing agreements? Notice that nowhere in the original press release does it actually state what the financial impact may be to the bottom line of the GWRX balance sheet. The speculator is left only to hope and dream that maybe this just might be the next QCOM. There is really now comparison of course because QCOM apparent has about 350 different patents. So what might be going on here? Is there or isn't there in fact going to be significant income from these license agreements to justify the great speculation that is going on here amongst investors and traders? I would like to hear some thoughtful (NO HYPE) comments from the board on this matter.

I don't have real player here at my office...can anyone verify? TIA,

-dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News