Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: milo_morai who wrote (88940)	1/22/2000 12:38:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (4) of 1572338

milo - <PB it is Accurate <AMD is perfecting Copper NOW [2Q, 2000], whereas INTC will have to attempt copper later. I'd say your trying to spin my words, as AMD will be a full year ahead of INTC in using copper.> No, it is a professional opinion. I am not trying to spin your words. I am articulating Intel's position on Cu, which it has been publicly doing for two years. As a business decision, I firmly believe it would have been a huge mistake for Intel to implement Cu on .18. Intel's Al process has demonstrated that it is more than capable, and is quite highly regarded in Process Tech circles, for both the performance it achieves, and the sizeable cost advantage on .18 over Copper due to immature Cu equipment status. If you think it is to AMD's advantage to implement Cu now, fine. Maybe it is better for AMD. Certainly not for Intel, for a multitude of reasons. As far as Intel is concerned, it would not have been to its advantage to do so, and Intel feels that .13 is the sweet spot to implement a Cu process. I utterly concur. Intel will have a .13 Cu process in production before AMD will. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next