SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: milo_morai who wrote (88942)1/22/2000 5:10:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) of 1572211
 
Milo - <My point is still the same. INTC will not be using copper for a year, therefore AMD has 12months more experience using COPPER, it doesn't matter to me if it's 180nM or 130nM.>

milo, I think you miss my point, or choose to ignore it. Whatever. For a whole host of reasons, I believe the response to this simplistic argument, is something along the lines of BFD. If you think this is a huge advantage for AMD, fine.

I reiterate, Intel has been working with Cu for a few years now.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News