Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (88995)	1/22/2000 8:57:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (3) of 1572208

PB Re << I believe the response to this simplistic argument, is something along the lines of BFD>> Simplistic or not, Milo's argument makes sense, no reason to get vulgar. You said many times that manufacturing copper in volume is different than making a few in process development environment, due to CU contamination issues. AMD has experience in that respect and Intel does not. Re << If you think this is a huge advantage for AMD, fine.>> And if you want to believe that Intel ramps the 0.13 CU before AMD, FINE! Unless you provide some links proving your opinion, it is just that, an opinion. It seems to me that you expect your statements to not get challenged because you work in a fab. It does not work like that here PB. Mani

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next