Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: milo_morai who wrote (89075)	1/23/2000 1:56:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) of 1572531

milo - <10-4 I just felt you where adding more to what I really stated. I'm just more comfortable that AMD is a year ahead of INTC in Cu.. I didn't say you had to be Worried about it.> Got ya. No problem. I didn't mean to add to what you were saying. <Yes a very nice win for OUR Portland Trailblazers.> Sah-weet! BTW, I just found this currently posted article about .13 today. I found it earlier but I forgot to post it. It outlines some of the issues going forward. I haven't digested the whole thing yet, but I'll give you an opportunity to consume it: semiconductor.net EDIT: Note what it says about Cu device performance. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next