The fate of Techride, in SI's hands
If SI was not aware of the issues they are now. I had a long talk with someone at SI who now understands what would stop me from posting on SI Techride. A double standard would, justice for some would.
I've been surfing SI and I must say, what a boring place it is becoming. And how insulting to new members, no name threads that most people don't know how to enter. SI sucks for letting that go on. Start or use a no name thread and get suspended, that should be the rule for those who affront others.
SI is really going downhill and IMO the loss of Techride doesn't help SI's product. SI needs all the Techride boards it can get but having fun while making money is an art form not easily copied.
The issues have not changed with myself, SI and Mr. Harmon and until SI does the right thing, I'll keep doing what I've been doing, selling shares of stock of a company that is a willing part in the deception of investors.
In any business meeting, the meeting starts by taking care of old business. Before SI helps Harmon hype his 2000 list, let's clean up old business, the 1999 list.
For those of you who don't know Tokyo Joe is getting sued (in part) by the SEC for what he claims was his record and the SEC says is not. Harmon claims a record siliconinvestor.com
that is not what he put in print on January 6th internetstockreport.com
As you can see, dog stocks were dropped from the list and performers were added. SI seems to be the place where the changing went on. Look at this header, it was "updated" (changed, edited, etc.)on May 1st Subject 25566
The changes were later claimed for Harmon's year which could of looked like this if you picked stocks from the same list Steve used siliconinvestor.com
all are from Harmon's (above) in print picks for 1999.
SI has a chance to clean this up, to do the right thing. Techride will be in limbo until then and may never return.
I hope SI reads this sec.gov , especially the part about "lying about his performance record". SI with the 1999 list still in question, is pushing Harmon's 2000 list, siliconinvestor.com
If you can't figure out why SI would do this then maybe this will help you. e-harmon.com That's right, Russell has a vested interest in Harmon as does CNBC and others who have given little if no press about Steve's changed 1999 list. I'm not sure if Toyko Joe had a vested interest in SI and CNBC. Justice is equal, is it?
I talked with SI for some time on Friday and explained what I found and backed it up with links. Now what will SI do? I know what I'm doing. The XXXX thread wants to know who has been selling XXXX after such great earnings? It is me, I'm cooking frogs again, or should I say XXXX is cooking itself.
BLUE
|
