Interdigital Communication(IDCC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC)

IDCC 343.82

+4.8%

11:46 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (3613)	1/24/2000 7:29:00 PM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) of 5195

So you're the one giving Larson the bad advice? How can you say this with such seeming impunity? It may be in your better interest to contact a patent attorney to arrive at a better understanding. The same patent is not counted multiple times. Who's Larson? Darrell, I never said the same patent was counted multiple times, if you re-read my post you will find that I said "Actually, the same patented technique is counted multiple times" This clearly says it is the technique (or innovation)that is counted multiple times, not the patent. Yes, of course a U.S. patent is a different patent than a patent for the same invention that is issued in a foreign country I never claimed it was the exact same patent, that's ridiculous. You are really trying to split hairs since the whole point I was making was that the same invention is patented multiple times so the 800 patents referred to in the press release are not 800 separate inventions but that the same inventions are patented in multiple countries. Do you disagree with that? Other sincere opinions welcome Bux

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next