Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeff Dickson who wrote (3978)	1/25/2000 9:16:00 AM
From: Bruce Robbins	Read Replies (2) of 4504

>>but at the same time it is hard to believe that gravity anomaly gave from something that deep alone. So there is a good chance that there sulphide mass closer to the surface, or this thing is deep and huge.<< Jeff, IMO it is deep and possibly huge. The gravity anomaly would have been stronger if it was closer to the surface and they would have seen traces of the sulfide horizon in the top of hole 2. MAN knows what they are looking for at this point. The hole definitely proves that most of these gravity anomalies will come up with sulfides. Good news. The anomaly that piques my interest is TG-4 (west of TG-1). I wonder why they haven't drilled that one yet. Bruce

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next